Publications » Position papers » CBAM sectors statement on ETS and CBAM Trilogues
CBAM sectors statement on ETS and CBAM Trilogues
Downloads and links
Recent updates
The Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) represent key elements of the regulatory framework accompanying the transition towards climate neutrality of our sectors – aluminium, cement, fertilizers, steel.
The short-medium term horizon of this transition is more challenging than ever. Skyrocketing energy prices, high inflation, soaring carbon prices and related indirect costs, and raw materials shortages are unprecedented challenges. At present, CBAM sectors are heavily impacted, with unprecedented idling of capacities reaching 70% for ammonia in fertilizers’ production, 50% for primary aluminium and around 10% for steel, whilst in a sector like cement, some companies have faced a tripling of their production costs following the electricity price hike.
At the same time, the business case for low carbon investments in Europe is heavily challenged by the different regulatory and financial framework being developed by our trading partners, whose consistency with international trade law is frequently not subject to sufficient scrutiny. For instance, the Inflation Reduction Act will provide financial support for around $ 370 billion to low carbon investments in USA’s industry and energy, with a likely impact on global competition and trade patterns.
Against this background, it is indispensable to achieve the EU’s climate ambition for 2030 in a sustainable and socially fair manner. This requires strengthened carbon leakage provisions and measures supporting companies’ investments and avoiding disproportionate costs in the short to medium term.
Therefore, we would like to stress the following essential elements in view of the trilogue negotiations on ETS and CBAM.
1. Why is a cautious approach to the free allocation phase-out for CBAM sectors necessary?
Our sectors believe that the CBAM with actual payments by importers reflecting the price paid by EU domestic producers should complement free allocation at full benchmark levels until its effectiveness is proven. Should such solution not be possible, our sectors urge negotiators to support the Council proposal establishing the phasing out of free allowances between 2026 and 2035, with a slower reduction pace until 2030.
2. Why is a tangible export solution necessary and how can it be WTO compatible?
Our sectors believe that a tangible solution for exports can be implemented through several measures, such as retaining benchmark based free allocation or introducing an export adjustment. As demonstrated by multiple opinions by independent law firms, the WTO consistency of such measures needs to be deeply assessed according to their design and details and cannot be disregarded as a matter of principle. Ultimately, the export solution is meant to re-establish a global playing field for European producers subject to unilateral carbon costs while retaining incentives to further decarbonise. EU producers will not be granted any undue advantage over competitors.
Last but not least, our sectors want to emphasise the need to improve and strengthen the governance and enforcement of the CBAM, notably with regards to the role of the central authority, circumvention provisions, default values, the limitation of exceptions and the verification, transparency of data and a review mechanism.
Full statement available below.
Download this publication or visit associated links
Brussels, 10 September 2024 – The Draghi Report thoroughly identifies the bottlenecks to both the EU industry's decarbonisation and competitiveness. The proposed recommendations for energy-intensive industries, including on energy, trade, carbon leakage, financing and lead markets, should be integrated into the upcoming Clean Industrial Deal and implemented with concrete measures as a matter of urgency. Alignment across different policies is crucial, and should be accompanied by sector-specific initiatives to enable the transition of each industry including steel, asks the European Steel Association.
Brussels, 05 September 2024 – The latest developments in the steel sector and across critical value chains are worrying signs of a steady deterioration, endangering the survival and the transition of steelmakers and their key manufacturing customers in Europe, such as automotive. A Clean Industrial Deal including swift and radical measures in EU industrial, energy and trade policies, is the last chance to ensure Europe’s prosperity and shield European industry from cheap imports driven by third countries’ unfair trade practices, overcapacity and lower climate ambition, urges the European Steel Association.
Brussels, 25 July 2024 – Major indicators in the European steel market show a steeper-than-expected downward trend, further impacting the outlook for this year and the next. Poor demand conditions, driven by ongoing factors such as high energy prices, persistent inflation, economic uncertainty and geopolitical tensions, are exacerbated by a manufacturing crisis affecting the largest steel-using sectors, including construction and automotive. According to EUROFER’s latest Economic and Steel Market Outlook, apparent steel consumption is further deteriorating. After a slump (-3.1%) in the first quarter of 2024, its rebound for the full year has been revised downwards (to +1.4% from +3.2%), as well as for 2025 (+4.1% from +5.6%). Similarly, output in steel-using sectors, after a decline in the first quarter (-1.9%), is projected to experience a deeper-than-expected recession (-1.6% from -1%). A recovery is anticipated only in 2025 (+2.3%). Steel imports continue to show historically high shares (27%).